Numerous insurers have quit the Net Zero Insurance Alliance (NZIA) under pressure from climate denying politicians and officials in the US. The insurance industry has for decades been aware of the causes and serious consequences of climate change and its business model is being shaken by repeated multi-billion dollar climate disasters. Insurers and their trade associations need to go on the offensive and send a clear message that insurance will scale up climate action and take on the fossil fuel industry and its climate denying political servants.<\/b><\/p>\n<\/div> A trickle of NZIA members leaving the alliance in April turned into a flood in the second half of May. As of June 5, 17 companies have left the NZIA. This includes six of the alliance’s founder members: AXA<\/a><\/span>, Allianz, Munich Re, SCOR<\/a><\/span>, Swiss Re and Zurich. Out of this founding group of large European re\/insurers, only Aviva and Generali are left. The alliance is now less than half the size it was at the start of the year (1).<\/p>\n The flood of resignations was precipitated by a letter from 23 right-wing US state attorneys general (AGs) threatening NZIA members with potential antitrust legal action (2). The letter is a brazenly political attack which accuses insurers of advancing an \u201cactivist climate agenda\u201d (3). It absurdly blames high inflation on the so-far moderate steps a small minority of insurers have taken to reduce insurance for fossil fuel companies \u2014 while ignoring the role that fossil fuel dependence and climate change <\/a><\/span>have played in recent global price rises (4).<\/p>\n<\/div> It is of course the impacts of climate change that are pushing up insurance costs and causing parts of the world to become uninsurable. Since the early 1990s, global natural catastrophe insured losses have been growing at an annual rate of 5-7% (5) and have averaged about $100 billion over the past five years, with 71% of these losses in North America (6). They have also destroyed the food security and livelihoods of millions of people in poor countries who have contributed the least to climate change.<\/p>\n The response from both reinsurers and primary insurance companies to soaring losses has been to hike prices, limit coverage and even exit some markets (7). Homeowners in regions most exposed to storms and fire are feeling the consequences through steep hikes in property insurance rates. Two of the largest home insurers in California have just left the market due to wildfire risks (8). The Florida homeowners insurance market is in a state of crisis (due to both fraud and massive hurricane damage) which is only likely to deepen (9).<\/p>\n<\/div> The antitrust threat made by the US state attorneys general is widely considered to be without merit as the NZIA obliges its members to set (weak) targets <\/a><\/span>and report progress, but not to take specific actions. Meant to protect consumers from price-fixing, antitrust law is being used as a political weapon by fossil fuel industry-funded politicians to scare insurers from taking legitimate and necessary climate action.<\/p>\n It is notable that despite the AGs\u2019 bluster, and as noted by Law.com, \u201cno major climate-related litigation has been filed on antitrust grounds in the U.S.\u201d (10). Alec Burnside, a competition law attorney at international law firm Dechert, says that he has not seen \u201cany antitrust authority, anywhere in the world, having an issue with any of these [GFANZ] alliances\u00a0\u00bb (11). Burnside also notes the need for regulators to clarify that joint action on climate by the private sector is legal and appropriate, as is happening in both the EU and UK (12).<\/p>\n<\/div> The insurance industry must defend their members’ right to establish climate targets and take climate-related investment and risk management decisions. Insurance Europe, its national member associations, the International Insurance Society and other international insurance associations must forcefully and publicly stand up for increased climate action.<\/p>\n The insurance industry must do much more to promote climate action around the world and to take on fossil fuel interests in the US. The insurance industry and its trade bodies \u2014 including the US arms of the European insurers who have quit the NZIA \u2014 must prominently lobby for climate action, and must stop donating to climate denying politicians. Insurers must also step up their efforts to phase fossil fuels out of their insurance and investment portfolios, in-line with low\/no overshoot 1.5\u00b0C . Insurers must stop insuring and investing in the very fossil fuel companies that are funding the political campaign against them.<\/p>\n The departing NZIA members, including AXA<\/a><\/span>, Zurich<\/a><\/span> and \u00a0Allianz<\/a><\/span>, have stated that they will continue to deliver on their existing climate commitments. SCOR<\/a><\/span> even broadened its climate commitment at the same time as quitting NZIA. Under their net-zero commitments, insurers must publish transition plans in June<\/a><\/span> and set targets in July (13). The Insure our Future campaign and Reclaim Finance will monitor these companies\u2019 actions and hold them to account for implementing stronger climate policies.<\/p>\n Finally, regulation creates a level playing field and enables collective climate action. Insurance regulators need to ramp up efforts to align insurance with credible 1.5\u00b0C pathways. The insurance industry needs to support such efforts.<\/p>\n Insurers have been aware of the catastrophic consequences of climate change for at least the last half century and some have advocated for climate action. They now have an increased responsibility to push harder for scaled-up climate action, in the US and around the world, to end their support for fossil fuel expansion and to start phasing out all support for fossil fuels.<\/b><\/p>\n<\/div>Climate denial is harming insurance, and the planet<\/h2><\/span>
Anti-trust bluster<\/h2><\/span>
Insurers must double down on their climate commitments<\/h2><\/span>