Copublished with Sierra Club<\/p>\n<\/div>
9 November 2023 \u2013 Reclaim Finance, Sierra Club and seven other NGOs (1) have warned that a proposed new method for financial institutions to measure their decarbonisation impact is<\/b> \u201copaque, easily manipulated, and likely counter-productive\u201d. The comment was made in a detailed response to a consultation paper on how financial institutions can measure their contribution to financing the energy transition, published by the Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero (GFANZ) (2).\u00a0<\/b><\/p>\n<\/div> In the paper, GFANZ argues that the current approach of setting targets for financed emissions incentivizes financial institutions to deprive companies of the finance needed to transition to cleaner practices. The Alliance proposes a new \u201cExpected Emissions Reduction\u201d (EER) methodology which would reward financial institutions based on the estimated volume of emissions that would be avoided due to their investees\u2019 and clients\u2019 transition plans.<\/p>\n The NGOs warn that while the current approaches to decarbonization promoted by GFANZ and its member alliances need to be greatly improved, the EER approach is \u201cfatally flawed\u201d, and risks being used to justify continued high levels of finance for fossil fuel companies without putting any meaningful pressure on them to change. They note the\u00a0 risk that EER could become a core \u201ctransition\u201d metric for financial institutions, and could be taken up by financial regulators.<\/p>\n It is simply not credible to argue that oil and gas companies need more cash to support them in the transition, the NGOs say. Finance is needed, however, for sectors such as steel and cement to transition, and to shut down polluting infrastructure like coal plants. This transition and phaseout finance can be incentivized with robust policies that end finance for new fossil fuel consuming infrastructure, promote engagement practices with financial penalties for non-performance, and encourage funding for coal phaseouts.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div> Oil and gas companies are currently awash with cash, and only a pitiful proportion of that money is going to developing sustainable energy supplies. It is nonsensical to believe that shoveling even more money in the direction of fossil fuel companies is the key to reducing their emissions. The proposed \u2018expected emissions reductions\u2019 approach is based on subjective counterfactual guesstimates that will be easily gamed by companies and their funders. This is in fact the same approach used to generate carbon offsets, and is the main reason why the offsetting market is suffering from a crisis of legitimacy, something GFANZ should pay careful heed to.<\/i><\/p>\n<\/div> Patrick McCully, Senior Energy Analyst at Reclaim Finance<\/b><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div> The recent proposal from GFANZ on how financial institutions can measure their decarbonization impacts enables a new paradigm of greenwashing, in which financial institutions can continue businesses as usual while patting themselves on the back for so-called transition financing. The financial sector plays a key role in facilitating the transition to a clean energy economy. But this won\u2019t happen if voluntary initiatives pave the way for polluting companies to game the system and raise billions of dollars without doing anything to actually align their business with global climate goals.<\/i><\/p>\n<\/div> Adele Shraiman, Senior Campaign Strategist with the Sierra Club\u2019s Fossil-Free Finance campaign<\/b><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div> The NGOs note that the answer to the flaws and lack of ambition of finance sector decarbonization targets is to improve their design, level of ambition, and implementation. It is also imperative that decarbonization targets be just one part of financial institution net-zero transition plans. Key elements of credible transition plans have been outlined by the UN High-Level Expert Group<\/a><\/span> on net zero (HLEG), and must include effective engagement, exclusion and voting criteria<\/a><\/span>, and an end to finance for fossil fuel expansion<\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div>