22 October 2024 – Today, Italian insurer Generali announced it will no longer provide insurance for risks associated with oil and gas expansion, including new liquified natural gas (LNG) terminals and gas-fired power plants (1). Generali is the first insurer globally to adopt a policy covering the entire oil and gas value chain for \u2018transition laggards\u2019 (2), marking a major step forward in driving climate action. Despite the limits of the policy, <\/b>Insure Our Future<\/b><\/a><\/span> welcomes this announcement and urges other major insurers, such as Chubb, Allianz, AXA, and Sompo, to go further by introducing robust policies to end their support for oil and gas expansion on the entire value chain, including LNG.\u00a0<\/b><\/p>\n<\/div> Generali, one of the top 20 insurers globally (3) and Italy\u2019s largest, had already made a commitment not to underwrite risks related to upstream oil and gas expansion (new oil and gas fields), and has now expanded this to include risks related to midstream and downstream oil and gas expansion (new LNG terminals, new oil and gas pipelines and new oil and gas-fired power plants).<\/p>\n While Generali\u2019s commitment not to insure new upstream oil and gas projects applies to all companies, its policy for new midstream and downstream infrastructure only applies to energy companies found to be \u2018transition laggards\u2019.<\/p>\n This means new midstream and downstream oil and gas projects developed by companies not considered \u00ab\u00a0transition laggards\u00a0\u00bb could still be insured by Generali. Generali appears to believe that companies developing new midstream infrastructure could still achieve net zero by 2050. But\u00a0 the International Energy Agency\u2019s net zero scenario is clear that any new oil and gas field or LNG export terminal threatens the achievement of the net zero goal (4).<\/p>\n The move to stop insuring new LNG terminals is significant, as LNG producers are planning to triple their production capacity globally to 1480 Mtpa (5). Just last week the International Energy Agency\u2019s (IEA) World Energy Outlook highlighted again the risks of global over-capacity in LNG export facilities (6).<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div> Generali\u2019s announcement is a first for the insurance world and a step forward but it does not go far enough. Generali’s commitment to stop covering risks related to oil and gas expansion leaves the door open to new developments. It seems to think that a company developing new oil and gas projects can be in transition. But the science is clear. There is no room for new oil and gas projects if we want to preserve an insurable world.O<\/i>ther insurers such as\u00a0 Allianz, AXA, Chubb and Sompo must step up and introduce policies covering all new oil and gas projects now. <\/i><\/em><\/p>\n<\/div> Ariel Le Bourdonnec, Reclaim Finance insurance campaigner Generali’s move is a clear signal to the market that long-term risks associated with oil & gas expansion have become too high. Italian financial institutions should recognise this and stop financing the new gas infrastructure of Italy’s fossil giant, Eni, in line with IEA’s recommendation to keep global warming under 1.5\u00b0C.<\/i><\/em><\/p>\n<\/div> Antonio Tricarico from ReCommon <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div> The move could also have global implications.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div> Generali’s policy change could have major implications for Asian insurers, including Sompo, who will need to enforce effective policies to stop insuring new gas projects with significant climate impacts, such as the Rio Grande LNG export terminal on the Gulf Coast.<\/i><\/em><\/p>\n<\/div> Yuki Tanabe, Program Director for Japan Center for a Sustainable Environment and Society (JACSES)<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div> LNG terminals are disasters for the communities in which they\u2019re built. Recent research linked 60 premature deaths a year to the air pollution from these methane export terminals in the US, fisherfolk have seen waters that were abundant for years run bare, and the same insurers underwriting these projects are abandoning homeowners. <\/i>Insurers like Chubb, AIG, and Travelers, are running out of reasons to not follow the lead of Generali to avoid the risks of this destructive industry.<\/i><\/em><\/p>\n<\/div> Ethan Nuss, Senior Energy Finance Campaigner for Rainforest Action Network <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div> Generali is also one of the insurers to have joined the Forum for Insurance Transition to Net Zero (FIT) (7), which was created to advance climate action across the insurance industry. Many major insurers, including Lloyd\u2019s of London, have not joined the FIT. Moreover, Lloyd\u2019s remains the only major insurer in Europe without any commitment to end underwriting for risks related to fossil fuel expansion (8).<\/p>\n Generali is also introducing new restrictions on its investment portfolio for companies identified as \u2018transition laggards\u2019. In particular, Generali will no longer invest in new bonds issued by such companies.<\/p>\n Generali\u2019s policy to end its support for oil and gas expansion now sets the highest standard among global property and casualty insurers. This follows Zurich\u2019s recent<\/a><\/span> decision to stop insuring new oil and gas fields.<\/p>\n Campaigners are urging other insurers to follow Generali\u2019s example, calling on AXA, Chubb and Sompo to introduce robust policies that address upstream and midstream fossil fuel expansion, including LNG.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div>
\n<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div>