French banks not turning the page on fossil expansion

Copublished with Friends of the Earth France

Paris, May 13th 2024 – Against climate science and their own commitments to limit warming to 1.5°C, major French banks provided US$67 billion for fossil fuel expansion between 2021 and 2023. This is revealed in the new edition of Banking on Climate Chaos published by eight organizations including Reclaim Finance, with support from Friends of the Earth France (1). While French banks reduced their financing to fossil fuel developers in 2023, Reclaim Finance and Friends of the Earth France call on BNP Paribas, Crédit Agricole, Société Générale, and BPCE to permanently cease all support for fossil fuel expansion and significantly increase their support for sustainable energy provision (2).

The 15th edition of the Banking On Climate Chaos report, which constitutes the largest and most comprehensive global analysis of fossil fuel financing, this year covers a broader scope of the sector by including the entire value chain (3).

It reveals that since the end of 2015, the 60 largest global banks have provided US$6.896 trillion to fossil fuels (4). U.S. banks remain at the top of the ranking with 31% of the financing provided to the sector, followed by Chinese banks (15%), Canadian banks (13%), and Japanese banks (11%). English and then French banks follow with 8% and 7% of fossil fuel financing since 2016, respectively.

While French banks have committed to achieving carbon neutrality by 2050 following a 1.5°C trajectory by joining the Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero (GFANZ) in 2021, they provided US$67 billion for fossil fuel expansion between 2021 and 2023 (5). This support comes 99% from four banks: BNP Paribas (US$23.9 billion), Crédit Agricole (US$17 billion), Société Générale (US$15.6 billion), and Banque Populaire Caisse d’Epargne (BPCE – US$9.7 billion).

Although the four major French banks now appear to have limited exposure to the coal sector, they continue to heavily finance the oil and gas sector – with US$57.6 billion allocated to its expansion between 2021 and 2023 (6).

In the face of climate signals in the red, it is imperative to tackle the entire fossil fuel chain! The fact that banks continue to finance new fields or liquefied natural gas terminals is as catastrophic for the climate as it is indicative of the inadequacy of their sectoral policies. Banks must urgently cease financing the expansion of oil and gas and prioritize funding for sustainable energy sources for electricity production.

Lucie Pinson, Director at Reclaim Finance

The four French banks are particularly exposed to major public and private oil and gas companies (7) – including TotalEnergies, Eni, and Saudi Aramco – which they supported with over US$26.8 billion between 2021 and 2023, making France the second-largest country supporting these companies despite their fossil fuel expansion strategies.

In 2023, one notable development is the reduction in financing from French banks to these companies (8). While these companies requested less financing (9), they also generally stayed away from several transactions, especially in the second half of the year. This behavior contrasts with past financing, particularly for BNP Paribas, traditionally a leading bank behind these companies (10). The bank thus drops from 3rd place in 2021 to 9th place in 2023.

While the decrease in financing from BNP Paribas to major companies is welcomed, it must translate into a firm commitment to cease supporting any further expansion of oil and gas. Without such a policy, BNP Paribas remains entrenched in a logic of case-by-case decision-making, rather than having the courage of a genuine climate strategy. This leaves the door open to new transactions that are toxic and contradictory to its own promises, as evidenced by its financing of Eni in 2023 (11).

Lorette Philippot, campaigner at Friends of the Earth France

While BPCE can still finance new gas fields, unlike the other major French banks, none of them have committed to no longer directly financing new liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminals. In fact, between 2021 and 2023, Crédit Agricole and BPCE even increased their financing for LNG expansion by 40% and 41% respectively (12).

However, it is even more concerning regarding financing to companies, which represent almost all of the financial support to the sector, that policies are lacking. Despite the specificities of each bank (13), they all converge on one point: French banks can still support integrated companies that, like majors, are active throughout the value chain – even if they are developing new projects for production and transportation in fossil fuels.

Contacts:

Notes:

  1. Banking On Climate Chaos, May 2024. The report is published by 8 organizations – BankTrack, CEED, Indigenous Environmental Network, Oil Change International, Rainforest Action Network, Reclaim Finance, Sierra Club, and Urgewald – with the support of Friends of the Earth France.
  2. Sustainable energy sources can include solar energy (photovoltaic and thermal), wind energy (onshore and offshore), hydroelectricity under certain conditions, wave and tidal energy, and geothermal energy.
  3. Among the 4,200 companies covered in the report are now companies active in metallurgical coal and a broader scope of companies active in liquefied natural gas (LNG) in addition to companies already present in extraction, transportation, and electricity production from fossil fuels. See the methodological note in French on the 2024 edition.
  4. J.P. Morgan Chase is the top financial supporter of fossil fuels in 2023, with US$41 billion. Mizuho ranks second, with US$37 billion, while Bank of America holds the third position (see the international press release from the organizations of the Banking on Climate Chaos).
  5. In the 2024 edition, the financing amounts for fossil fuel expansion correspond to the sums allocated to all companies with expansion plans, based on public information from the Global Coal Exit List (mines, power plants, and coal-related infrastructure) and the Global Oil and Gas Exit List (oil and gas fields, pipelines, LNG terminals, and gas power plants).
  6. This figure corresponds to new production (upstream) and transportation (midstream, i.e., pipelines and LNG terminals) projects, which the International Energy Agency (IEA) projects to cease in the Net Zero Emission by 2050 scenario. In detail, BNP Paribas provided US$19.3 billion, Crédit Agricole US$15.9 billion, Société Générale US$14.1 billion, and BPCE US$8.3 billion.
  7. The supported companies include ADNOC, BP, Chevron, Equinor, Eni, ExxonMobil, Petrobras, QatarEnergy, Repsol, Saudi Aramco, Shell, and TotalEnergies. The 2024 analysis of their climate strategies is available here. These companies represent nearly 39% of short-term exploration and production expansion plans and 16.5% of liquefaction terminal expansion plans. It’s worth noting that 31% of French banks’ financing to the oil and gas sector between 2021 and 2023 is concentrated in 12 oil and gas companies.
  8. BNP Paribas’ financing in 2023 decreased by 78% compared to 2021, Société Générale’s decreased by 82%, Crédit Agricole’s decreased by 63%, and BPCE’s decreased by 52%. BNP Paribas dropped from 3rd place in 2021 to 9th place in 2023, Société Générale dropped from 6th to 15th place, Crédit Agricole moved up from 11th to 7th place, and BPCE maintained its position at 17th place.
  9. Between 2021 and 2023, overall financing to the 12 major public and private oil and gas companies decreased by 67.8%, dropping from US$76 billion in 2021 to US$24.4 billion in 2023. This significant decrease in international bank financing indicates that these companies have recently sought to raise much less debt.
  10. Over the period 2019-2023, BNP Paribas was the top financial supporter of BP, Shell, TotalEnergies and the third supporter of Eni
  11. In December 2023, BNP Paribas contributed to a loan of US$3 billion to the Italian company Eni.
  12. Crédit Agricole notably financed the Port Arthur LNG and Cameron LNG projects in the United States. Meanwhile, the BPCE Group financed Plaquemines LNG and Calcasieu Pass, two liquefied natural gas (LNG) projects, derived from shale gas, also in the United States.
  13. The BPCE Group only excludes oil extraction projects and companies involved in unconventional fossil fuels. The other three banks also exclude gas extraction projects and certain midstream infrastructures. Their restrictions on oil and gas companies are stronger than those taken by BPCE, but still allow support for companies with the majority of expansion plans (+70%). See our analysis of their sectoral policies in the Oil & Gas Policy Tracker.

Read also

2024-05-15T09:19:19+02:00