Assessment of oil and gas companies’ climate strategy2023-12-12T17:12:48+01:00

Assessment of oil and gas

companies’ climate strategy

European and US 9 largest oil and gas companies and the 5 largest National Oil Companies accounted for 35.9% of global production in 2022 and 45.4% of near-term expansion plans. 

Some financial players think that it is essential to support these companies to transform their operations to allow a gradual reduction in hydrocarbon production in line with the goal of limiting global warming to 1.5°C and meeting the need for major investment in the deployment of renewable energy supplies. For others, oil and gas companies are structurally incapable of change and should be seen as a source of risk that must be managed or avoided through the use of restrictions or exclusions. In both cases, it is essential that financial actors base their decisions about oil and gas companies on facts. 

To this end, Reclaim Finance has analyzed the climate strategies of the 14 largest NOCs, European and US oil and gas companies. We have selected a number of indicators that are fundamental to evaluating their measures in relation to meeting the objective of limiting global warming to 1.5°C. The aim is to answer three major questions: Does the company publish adequate information to assess its trajectory towards 2030? What is its capital expenditure plan? And what are its production and greenhouse gas emission targets? 

Discover the main findings of our analysis and download below detailed briefings for each of the 12 oil and gas companies.
For information, a glossary is available here.

methodology

Because of the importance of cutting greenhouse gas emissions by about half over the decade, the analysis focuses on targets to 2030. 

The IEA’s NZE scenario proposes a pathway to meet the world’s energy needs while having a chance to keep global warming below 1.5°C. In particular, this scenario projects: 

  • a halt to the development of new oil and gas production projects and liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminals. 
  • a decrease in oil and gas production of 21% and 18% respectively by 2030 compared to the 2022 level. 
  • A 2.1 x increase in total energy investments with a tripling of investments in sustainable energy, end-use and energy efficiency, so that by 2030, nine dollars are invested in these solutions for every dollar invested in fossil fuels. 

The analysis compares the greenhouse gas emission projections with the International Energy Agency’s (IEA) Net Zero Emissions by 2050 (NZE) scenario and its Announced Pledges Scenario (APS), which follows a < 2°C trajectory. 

key findings

None of the climate strategies are aligned with a 1.5°C scenario.

Analysis of the climate strategies of these nine oil and gas companies compared to the IEA’s Net Zero Emission by 2050 (NZE) scenario shows that their production plans, cash flows and energy mix do not allow them to follow a 1.5°C trajectory.

No halt to oil and gas expansion.

None of the companies have committed to stop oil and gas expansion, contrary to IEA projections and UN recommendations.

Production targets too high.

When publishing production targets, all companies aim to produce more oil and gas in 2030 than required in the IEA’s NZE scenario. 

Insufficient investment in sustainable energy.

Investments in 2022 in renewable energy remain well below those in fossil fuels. U.S. companies are not reporting any investment in sustainable energy.

An energy mix in 2030 based on fossil fuels.

All of them forecast an energy mix in 2030 that would still include between 78% and more than 99% fossil fuels.

Exceeding the 1.5°C carbon budget in 2030.

All of them will emit more greenhouse gases in 2030 than allowed in a 1.5°C scenario.

A lack of transparency in climate strategies.

All have opaque climate strategies that contain little detailed data.

Climate strategies analysis

Our last publications