At first glance, Engie’s new commitment to give up its coal assets, in Europe by 2025 and in the rest of the world by 2027, might look impressive. But in truth this policy, announced alongside the French energy giant’s financial accounts for 2020, is a non-announcement which skirts around the key questions around the future of its assets, allowing them to be sold off or converted to gas or biomass, instead of being closed down for good, while failing to protect workers.

Engie is still today operating 10 coal plants spread out between Portugal, Morocco, Chile, Brazil and Peru, constituting a total of 4GW. Climate science is unanimous on the need to plan for the closure of all existing coal assets and to decarbonize the energy sector in the shortest time possible. If the coal exit dates announced by Engie are in line with the science, it spells bad news for the climate.

Flawed conversion proposals

In fact, even if some assets might be closed, Engie is also planning on the sale and above all the conversion of its assets. In an interview on FranceInter last December, Claire Waysand, interim director-general and general secretary of Engie group, mentioned two conversion options: biomass or gas, and not renewable energies like solar which could provide a solution for plants in Chile and Brazil.

But by converting its coal power plants into gas or biomass, Engie is exchanging one climate-damaging energy source for another. Biomass has an even worse impact on the climate than coal and cutting down forests isn’t a bright idea when biodiversity is disappearing at an unprecedented rate. As for gas, it should be remembered that it is still a fossil fuel and that for plants in Chile and Brazil this could mean importing fracked gas from the US or Argentina. It’s vital, then, that Engie’s shareholders act immediately to prevent the company from sinking ever deeper into false solutions, thereby exposing them to stranded assets.

False Promises on Emissions

Engie has already made clear that it wishes to convert its inactive coal plant in Italy into gas. This underlines the fact that Engie might well choose to convert its plant in Portugal into gas, despite the European Union boasts of its exemplary climate credentials.

Engie also suggested that it could sell some plants. While this might allow it to decarbonize its portfolio, this wouldn’t entail actual CO2e emission reductions in the real world. Engie has already sold 14 coal plants representing 54% of its capacity (11,356 MW) since COP21.

Finally, Engie speaks of carbon neutrality in its strategy, but to reach carbon neutrality by 2050 an alignment with 1.5°C is necessary. Engie’s strategy, however, currently involves a 2°C objective certified by the SBTi, which is blatantly insufficient to reach carbon neutrality.

Behind the gloss of this announcement, Engie isn’t even bothering to conceal its alarming lack of ambition in its coal exit strategy. After flogging off its fleet of coal plants in Asia and Europe, it has let it be known that it might do the same for its 10 remaining plants. This false solution would be a complete abdication of its social and environmental responsibility: it would leave the face of these ultra-polluting assets, as well as the employees of these sites, in the hands of unethical companies intent on gambling on coal in 2021.

Reclaim Finance and Friends of the Earth France call on Engie to explicitly commit to closing its coal power plants and to a just transition for all its workers throughout the world, and not to sell or convert its assets to other energy sources which are deadly for the climate.