Assessment of oil and gas companies’ climate strategy2025-09-01T17:19:29+02:00

Assessment of oil and gas

companies’ climate strategy

12 of the largest publicly listed integrated oil and gas companies in Europe and the United States, along with national oil and gas companies (NOC), accounted for a huge 28% of global production in 2023, 40% of near-term exploration and production expansion plans, and 18% of liquefaction terminal expansion plans.

These companies bear a major responsibility for the climate change that is already affecting entire economies and millions of people. Winding down their fossil fuel activities—including rapidly halting expansion strategies and gradually dismantling existing facilities—directly determines our ability to limit global warming to as close to 1.5°C as possible.

But is such a transformation possible, or is it just an illusion, given that most have recently backtracked on their climate commitments, announcing an increase in hydrocarbon production by 2030 and a decline in their investments in renewables?

To enable financial actors to adapt their financing, investment, and engagement strategies, Reclaim Finance has analyzed their orientations in detail. Several key indicators have been selected to assess the credibility of their climate action. All aim to answer three questions:

  • What are the company’s investment choices?
  • What are its production and greenhouse gas emission targets?
  • To what extent is the company really diversifying?

Read about the main conclusions of our analysis and download a detailed briefing specific to each of the 12 oil and gas companies below. For your convenience, a glossary is available here.

methodology

Given the importance of cutting greenhouse gas emissions within the current decade, our analysis focuses on corporate targets for 2030.

The International Energy Agency’s (IEA) Net Zero Emissions by 2050  Scenario (NZE), which is based on a 1.5°C trajectory, was chosen as the main reference scenario. This scenario models:

  • A drop in oil and gas production of 21% and 13% respectively by 2030, compared with 2023 levels.
  • A halt to the development of new oil and gas fields and liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminals.
  • A 3-fold increase in installed renewables capacity by 2030, which requires doubling current investment levels in renewable power, grids and battery storage to USD $2.5 trillion by 2030.
  • A 75% reduction in investment in fossil fuel production between 2023 and 2035, as well as a 2.5-fold increase in “clean energy” investment over the same period to maintain reliable energy supplies.

Our analysis puts the 12 oil and gas companies’ projections into perspective against the NZE.

key findings

None of the climate strategies are aligned with a 1.5°C scenario.

Analysis of the climate strategies of these 12 oil and gas companies in relation to the NZE scenario shows that their investments, production plans and diversification strategies do not enable them to follow a 1.5°C trajectory. 

Priority to shareholders and fossil fuels, particularly gas

Companies favored distributions to shareholders and investments in fossil fuels in 2024 rather than investing in sustainable energy

Continued expansion of oil and gas

None has committed to halting oil and gas expansion, contrary to the NZE scenario and UN recommendations.

An energy mix in 2030 based on fossil fuels

All of them forecast an energy mix in 2030 that would still include between 78% and more than 99% fossil fuels.

Exceeding the 1.5°C carbon budget in 2030

All of them will emit more greenhouse gases in 2030 than allowed in a 1.5°C scenario.

Misleading diversification

All companies communicate on diversification, while promoting gas power or other false solutions such as bioenergy.

Climate backtracking

Most companies backtracked on their climate commitments recently, prioritizing upstream and/or reducing support to renewable energy.

Climate strategies analysis

Our last publications